An Account of the Proceedings on the Trial of Susan B. Anthony - LightNovelsOnl.com
You're reading novel online at LightNovelsOnl.com. Please use the follow button to get notifications about your favorite novels and its latest chapters so you can come back anytime and won't miss anything.
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Was you one of the officers engaged in making that registry?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. When the registry was being made did Miss Anthony appear before the Board of Registry and claim to be registered as a voter?
A. She did.
Q. Was there any objection made, or any doubt raised as to her right to vote?
A. There was.
Q. On what ground?
A. On the ground that the Const.i.tution of the State of New York did not allow women to vote.
Q. What was the defect in her right to vote as a citizen?
A. She was not a male citizen.
Q. That she was a woman?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Did the Board consider that and decide that she was ent.i.tled to register?
Objected to. Objection overruled.
Q. Did the Board consider the question of her right to registry, and decide that she was ent.i.tled to registry as a voter?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And she was registered accordingly?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. When she offered her vote, was the same objection brought up in the Board of Inspectors, or question made of her right to vote as a woman?
A. She was challenged previous to election day.
Q. It was canva.s.sed previous to election day between them?
A. Yes, sir; she was challenged on the second day of registering names.
Q. At the time of the registry, when her name was registered, was the Supervisor of Election present at the Board?
A. He was.
Q. Was he consulted upon the question of whether she was ent.i.tled to registry, or did he express an opinion on the subject to the inspectors?
MR. CROWLEY: I submit that it is of no consequence whether he did or not.
JUDGE SELDEN: He was the Government Supervisor under this act of Congress.
MR. CROWLEY: The Board of Inspectors, under the State law, const.i.tute the Board of Registry, and they are the only persons to pa.s.s upon that question.
THE COURT: You may take it.
A. Yes, sir; there was a United States Supervisor of Elections, two of them.
By JUDGE SELDEN:
Q. Did they advise the registry, or did they not?
A. One of them did.
Q. And on that advice the registry was made with the judgment of the inspectors.
A. It had a great deal of weight with the inspectors, I have no doubt.
_Re-direct Examination by_ MR. CROWLEY:
Q. Was Miss Anthony challenged before the Board of Registry?
A. Not at the time she offered her name.
Q. Was she challenged at any time?
A. Yes, sir; the second day of the meeting of the Board.
Q. Was the preliminary and the general oath administered?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Won't you state what Miss Anthony said, if she said anything, when she came there and offered her name for registration?
A. She stated that she did not claim any rights under the const.i.tution of the State of New York; she claimed her right under the const.i.tution of the United States.
Q. Did she name any particular amendment?
A. Yes, sir; she cited the 14th amendment.
Q. Under that she claimed her right to vote?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Did the other Federal Supervisor who was present, state it as his opinion that she was ent.i.tled to vote under that amendment, or did he protest, claiming that she did not have the right to vote?
