The Great Strike on the 'Q' - LightNovelsOnl.com
You're reading novel online at LightNovelsOnl.com. Please use the follow button to get notifications about your favorite novels and its latest chapters so you can come back anytime and won't miss anything.
Q. What is your name? A. Stewart W. Hadlock.
Where do you reside? At Aurora.
What is your business? Engineer.
How long have you been an engineer? Nineteen years.
In what company's employ were you recently? C., B. & Q.
How long were you in the employ of that company? Twenty-three years.
As engineer and fireman? Engineer and fireman both.
Do you know Hose De Witt? I do.
Do you know in whose employ he now is? He is in the employ of the C., B. & Q.
In what capacity? Pa.s.senger engineer.
Hector H. Hall was examined in chief by Mr. Sullivan, and testified:
Q. What is your name? A. Hector H. Hall.
Where do you live? At Pullman.
What is your occupation? Engineer.
What company are you working for? Pullman Company.
Do you know Hose De Witt? Yes, sir.
How long have you known him? About eight years.
Is he a sober man? No, sir.
What is his general reputation for sobriety? He is an habitual drunkard.
Is that the reputation in the neighborhood where he lives? Yes, sir.
Have you ever heard it discussed? His wife has been around to all the saloons forbidding them to sell him anything.
Why? Because he was an habitual drunkard.
When did you see him last? I think it was last Thanksgiving day.
What condition was he in then? He was very drunk.
Did you ever see him sober? Well, no, sir; very seldom. I have once or twice, probably; as a general thing he was under the influence of liquor.
John B. Clark, examined in chief by Mr. Sullivan, testified:
Q. State your name? A. John B. Clark.
Where do you live? Aurora.
What is your business? I was a locomotive engineer.
How long were you engaged in that capacity? Ten years, probably.
For what company were you employed? Chicago, Burlington & Quincy.
Did you serve on any committee for that road while you were in its employ? I was on the local examining board for the Chicago division.
Do you know Hose De Witt? I do.
How long have you known him? About fourteen years, I think.
Do you know he was discharged from this company because of his connection with a wreck at Naperville? I do.
Do you know what his reputation for sobriety is and has been during all the time of your acquaintance? He was always a hard drinker, when he fired and run here both.
Have you known him since he was in the employ of the company; have you seen him since? I have seen him on my way through Plano; he worked at Plano for the Plano Manufacturing Company, and I see him there about in the neighborhood of a year ago; he struck me for a ride to Chicago.
Mr. Dawes: I object to any specific instance of drunkenness a year ago.
Mr. Sullivan: Was he drunk or sober? A. He was not sober.
Did you ever see him sober? I don't think I did; not what I should call dead sober.
You have known him eight years? I have known him fourteen years.
Why did you refuse to give him a ride when he applied to you? Well, it was against the rules; and then he was too full of whisky to be a safe man to have around there.
You haven't seen him since, then? I have not, except since he came back to work for the C., B. & Q.
Acting as engineer? Yes, sir.
Pa.s.senger or freight? Pa.s.senger.
On what road? On the C., B. & Q., on the main line?
Mr. Dawes, cross-examining: Did you regard that as a proper method of determining the qualifications of engineers? A. Yes, sir; it is well enough.
Is this (handing witness a paper) an accurate copy of the protest of the Brotherhood? I will direct your attention to Article 22. I don't represent the Brotherhood; I am here as a witness.
I will ask you whether you know as a matter of fact, Mr. Clark, whether Article 22 is a copy of a grievance presented by the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers to the Burlington road? I did not present it.
I understand you did not; you know, do you not?
