LightNovesOnl.com

History of Roman Literature from its Earliest Period to the Augustan Volume I Part 5

History of Roman Literature from its Earliest Period to the Augustan - LightNovelsOnl.com

You're reading novel online at LightNovelsOnl.com. Please use the follow button to get notifications about your favorite novels and its latest chapters so you can come back anytime and won't miss anything.

"Indignatur item privatis, ac prope socco Dignis carminibus, narrari cna Thyestae."

Yet this spiritless tragedy, was very popular in Rome, and continued to be frequently represented, till Varius treated the same subject in a manner, as we are informed by Quintilian, equal to the Greeks(178).

It thus appears that Ennius has little claim to originality or invention as a tragic author. Perhaps it may seem remarkable, that a poet of his powerful genius did not rather write new plays, than copy servilely from the Greeks. But nothing is ever invented where borrowing will as well serve the purpose. Rome had few artists, in consequence of the facility with which the finest specimens of the arts were procured by plundering the towns of Sicily and Greece. Now, at the period in which Ennius flourished, the productions of Grecian literature were almost as new to the Romans as the most perfectly original compositions. Thus, the dramatic works of Ennius were possessed of equal novelty for his audience as if wholly his own; while a great deal of trouble was saved to himself. The example, however, was unfortunate, as it communicated to Roman literature a character of servility, and of imitation, or rather of translation, from the Greek, which so completely pervaded it, that succeeding poets were most faultless when they copied most closely, and at length, when they abandoned the guides whom they had so long followed, they fell into declamation and bombast. Probably, had the compositions of Ennius been original, they would have been less perfect, than by being thus imitated, or nearly translated, from the masterpieces of Greece. But the literature of his country might ultimately have attained a higher eminence. The imitative productions of Ennius may be likened to those trees which are transplanted when far advanced in growth. Much at first appears to have been gained; but it is certain, that he who sets the seedling is more useful than the transplanter, and that, while the trees removed from their native soil lose their original beauty and luxuriance without increase in magnitude, the seedling swells in its parent earth to immensity of size-fresh, blooming, and verdant in youth, vigorous in maturity, and venerable in old age.

Nor, although Ennius was the first writer who introduced satiric composition into Rome, are his pretensions, in this respect, to originality, very distinguished. He adapted the ancient satires of the Tuscan and Oscan stage to the closet, by refining their grossness, softening their asperity, and introducing railleries borrowed from the Greek poets, with whom he was familiar. His satires thus appear to have been a species of _centos_ made up from pa.s.sages of various poems, which, by slight alterations, were humorously or satirically applied, and chiefly to the delineation of character: "Carmen," says Diomedes the grammarian, "quod ex variis poematibus constabat satira vocabatur, quale scripserunt Pacuvius et Ennius." The fragments which remain of these satires are too short and broken to allow us even to divine their subject. That ent.i.tled _Asotus_ vel _Sotadicus_, is the representation of a luxurious, dissolute man, and was so termed from Sotades, a voluptuous Cretan poet. Quintilian also mentions, that one of his satires contained a Dialogue between Life and Death, contending with each other, a mode of composition suggested perhaps by the celebrated allegory of Prodicus. We are farther informed by Aulus Gellius, that he introduced into another satire, with great skill and beauty, aesop's fable of the Larks(179), now well known through the imitation of Fontaine(180). The lark having built her nest among some early corn, feared that it might be reaped before her young ones were fit to take wing. She therefore desired them to report to her whatever conversation they might hear in the fields during her absence. They first informed her, that the husbandman had come to the spot, and desired his son to summon their neighbours and friends to a.s.sist in cutting the crop the next morning. The lark, on hearing this, declares, that there is no occasion to be in any haste in removing. On the following day, it is again reported, that the husbandman had desired that his relations should be requested to a.s.sist him; and the lark is still of opinion that there is no necessity to hurry away. At length, however, the young larks relate, that the husbandman had announced that he would execute the work himself. On hearing this, the old lark said it was now time to be gone. She accordingly removed her younglings, and the corn was immediately cut down by the master. From this tale Ennius deduces as the moral,

"Hoc erit tibi argumentum semper in promptu situm; Ne quid expectes amicos, quod tute agere possis."

It is certainly much to be regretted that we possess so scanty fragments of these satires, which would have been curious as the first attempts at a species of composition which was carried to such perfection by succeeding Latin poets, and which has been regarded as almost peculiar to the Romans.

The great work, however, of Ennius, and of which we have still considerable remains, was his Annals, or metrical chronicles, devoted to the celebration of Roman exploits, from the earliest periods to the conclusion of the Istrian war. These Annals were written by our poet in his old age; at least, Aulus Gellius informs us, on the authority of Varro, that the twelfth book was finished by him in his sixty-seventh year(181).

It may perhaps appear strange, that, when the fabulous exploits, the superst.i.tions, the characters and the manners, of the heroic ages, were so admirably adapted for poetical imagery, and had been so successfully employed in Greece, the chief work of the Father of Roman Song should have been a sort of versified newspaper, like the _Henriade_ of Voltaire, or the _Araucana_ of Alonco de Ercilla: For in other countries poetry has been earliest devoted to the decoration of those marvels in which the _amantes mira Camnae_ chiefly rejoice. In most lands, however, the origin of poetry was coeval with the rise of the nation, and every thing seems wondrous to an ignorant and timid race. The Greeks, in their first poetical age, peopled every grove and lake with fauns and naiads, or personified the primeval powers of nature. They sung the fables concerning their G.o.ds, and the exploits of heroes, in those ancient verses which have been combined in the Theogony attributed to Hesiod, and those immortal rhapsodies which have formed the basis of the Homeric poems. The marvellous vision of Dante was the earliest effort of the Italian muse; and some of the first specimens of verse in France and England were wild adventures in love or arms, interspersed with stories of demons and enchanters. But in Rome, though the first effort of the language was in poetry, five hundred years had elapsed from the foundation of the city before this effort was made. At that period, the Romans were a rude but rational race. The locks of Curius were perhaps uncombed; but though the Republic had as yet produced no character of literary elegance, she had given birth to Cincinnatus, and Fabricius, and Camillus. Her citizens had neither been rendered timid nor indolent by their superst.i.tions, but were actively employed in agriculture or in arms. They were a less contemplative and imaginative race than the Greeks. Their spirit was indeed sufficiently warlike; but that peculiar spirit of adventure, (which characterised the early ages of Greece, and the middle ages of modern Europe,) had, if it ever existed, long ago ceased in Rome. By this time, the Roman armies were too well disciplined, and the system of warfare too regular, to admit a description of the picturesque combats of the Greek and Trojan charioteers. Poetry was thus too late in its birth to take a natural flight. In such circ.u.mstances, the bard, however rich or lofty might be his conceptions, would not listen to his own taste or inspiration, but select the theme which was likely to prove most popular; and the Romans, being a national and ambitious people, would be more gratified by the jejune relation of their own exploits, than by the _speciosa miracula_ of the most sublime or romantic invention.

The Annals of Ennius were partly founded on those ancient traditions and old heroic ballads, which Cicero, on the authority of Cato's _Origines_, mentions as having been sung at feasts by the guests, many centuries before the age of Cato, in praise of the heroes of Rome(182). Niebuhr has attempted to show, that all the memorable events of Roman history had been versified in ballads, or metrical chronicles, in the Saturnian measure, before the time of Ennius; who, according to him, merely expressed in the Greek hexameter, what his predecessors had delivered in a ruder strain, and then maliciously depreciated these ancient compositions, in order that he himself might be considered as the founder of Roman poetry(183). The devotion of the Decii, and death of the Fabian family,-the stories of Scaevola, Cocles, and Coriola.n.u.s,-Niebuhr believes to have been the subjects of romantic ballads. Even Fabius Pictor, according to this author, followed one of these old legends in his narrative concerning Mars and the Wolf, and his whole history of Romulus. Livy, too, in his account of the death of Lucretia, has actually transcribed from one of these productions; since what s.e.xtus says, on entering the chamber of Lucretia, is nearly in the Saturnian measure:-

"Tace, Lucretia, inquit, s.e.xtus Tarquinius sum, Ferrum in manu est, moriere si emiseris vocem(184)."

But the chief work, according to Niebuhr, from which Ennius borrowed, was a romantic epopee, or chronicle, made up from these heroic ballads about the end of the fourth century of Rome, commencing with the accession of Tarquinius Priscus, and ending with the battle of Regillus. The arrival, says Niebuhr, of that monarch under the name of Luc.u.mo-his exploits and victories-his death-then the history of Servius Tullius-the outrageous pride of Tullia-the murder of the lawful monarch-the fall of the last Tarquin, preceded by a supernatural warning-Lucretia-Brutus and the truly Homeric battle of Regillus-compose an epic, which, in poetical incident, and splendour of fancy, surpa.s.ses everything produced in the latter ages of Rome(185). The battle of Regillus, in particular, as described by the annalists, bears evident marks of its poetical origin. It was not a battle between two hosts, but a struggle of heroes. As in the fights painted in the Iliad, the champions meet in single combat, and turn by individual exertions the tide of victory. The dictator Posthumius wounds King Tarquin, whom he had encountered at the first onset. The Roman knight Albutius engages with the Latin chief Mamilius, but is wounded by him, and forced to quit the field. Mamilius then nearly breaks the Roman line, but is slain by the Consul Herminius, which decides the fate of the day. After the battle of Regillus, all the events are not so completely poetical; but in the siege of Veii we have a representation of the ten years war of Troy. The secret introduction of the troops by Camillus into the middle of the city resembles the story of the wooden horse, and the Etruscan statue of Juno corresponds to the Trojan Palladium(186).

Any period of history may be thus exhibited in the form of an epic cycle; and, though there can be little doubt of the existence of ancient Saturnian ballads at Rome, I do not think that Niebuhr has adduced sufficient proof or authority for his magnificent epopee, commencing with the accession of Tarquin, and ending with the battle of Regillus. With regard to the accusation against Ennius, of depreciating the ancient materials which he had employed, it is founded on the contempt which he expresses for the verses of the Fauns and the Prophets. His obligations, if he owed any, he has certainly nowhere acknowledged, at least in the fragments which remain; and he rather betrays an anxiety, at the commencement of his poem, to carry away the attention of the reader from the Saturnian muses, and direct it to the Grecian poets,-to Pindus, and the nymphs of Helicon.

He begins his Annals with an invocation to the nine Muses, and the account of a vision in which Homer had appeared to him, and related the story of the metamorphosis already mentioned:-

"Visus Homerus adesse poeta: Hei mihi qualis erat, quantum mutatus ab illo!

Septingenti sunt, paulo plus vel minus, anni Quom memini fieri me pavom."

Ennius afterwards invokes a great number of the G.o.ds, and then proceeds to the history of the Alban kings. The dream of the Vestal Virgin Ilia, which announced her pregnancy by Mars, and the foundation of Rome, is related in verses of considerable beauty and smoothness, by Ilia to her sister Eurydice.-

"Talia commemorat lacrumans, exterrita somno; 'Euridica prognata, pater quam noster amavit, Vivens vita meum corpus nunc deserit omne.

Nam me visus h.o.m.o polcer per amna salicta Et ripas raptare, locosque novos: ita sola Post illa, germana soror, errare videbar; Tardaque vestigare, et quaerere, neque posse Corde capessere: semita nulla pedem stabilibat.

Exin compellare pater me voce videtur Heis verbis-O gnata, tibi sunt antegerendae aerumnae; post ex fluvio fortuna resistet.

Haec pater ecfatus, germana, repente recessit; Nec sese dedit in conspectum corde cupitus: Quamquam multa ma.n.u.s ad cli caerula Templa Tendebam lacrumans, et blanda voce vocabam.

Vix aegro tum corde meo me somnus reliquit(187).'"

In these lines there is considerable elegance and pathos; and the contest which immediately succeeds between Romulus and Remus for the sovereignty of Rome, is as remarkable for dignity and animation:

"Curanteis magna c.u.m cura, concupienteis Regnei, dant operam simul auspicio, augurioque: Hinc Remus auspicio se devovet, atque secundam Solus avem servat: at Romolus polcer in alto Quaerit Aventino, servans genus altivolantum.

Omnis cura vireis, uter esset Endoperator.

Exspectant, veluti consol, quom mittere signum Volt, omneis avidei spectant ad carceris oras, Qua mox emittat picteis ex faucibus currus.

Sic exspectabat populus, atque ore timebat Rebus, utrei magnei victoria sit data regnei.

Interea Sol albus recessit in infera noctis: Exin Candida se radiis dedit icta foras lux: Et simol ex alto longe polcerrima praepes Laeva volavit avis: simol aureus exoritur sol.

Cedunt ter quatuor de caelo corpora sancta Avium, praepetibus sese, polcreisque loceis dant.

Conspicit inde sibei data Romolus esse priora, Auspicio regni stabilita scamna, solumque(188)."

The reigns of the kings, and the contests of the republic with the neighbouring states previous to the Punic war, occupy the metrical annals to the end of the sixth book(189), which concludes with the following n.o.ble answer of Pyrrhus to the Roman amba.s.sadors, who came to ransom the prisoners taken from them by that prince in battle:-

"Nec mi aurum posco, nec mi pretium dederitis; Nec cauponantes bellum, sed belligerantes; Ferro, non auro, vitam cernamus utrique, Vosne velit, an me regnare Hera; quidve ferat sors Virtute experiamur; et hoc simol accipe dictum: Quorum virtutei belli fortuna pepercit, Horumdem me libertatei parcere certum est: Dono ducite, doque volentibus c.u.m magneis Dis(190)."

Cicero, in his _Brutus_, says, that Ennius did not treat of the first Punic war, as Naevius had previously written on that subject(191); to which prior work Ennius thus alludes:-

"Scripsere alii rem, Versibus, quos olim Faunei, vatesque canebant."

P. Merula, however, who edited the fragments of Ennius, is of opinion, that this pa.s.sage of Cicero can only mean that he had not entered into much detail of its events, as he finds several lines in the seventh book, which, he thinks, evidently apply to the first Carthaginian war, particularly the description of naval preparations, and the building of the first fleet with which the Carthaginians were attacked by the Romans.

In some of the editions of Ennius, the character of the friend and military adviser of Servilius, generally supposed to be intended as a portrait of the poet himself(192), is ranged under the seventh book:-

"Hocce locutus vocat, quic.u.m bene saepe libenter Mensam, sermonesque suos, rerumque suarum Comiter impert.i.t; magna quum lapsa dies jam Parte fuisset de parvis summisque gerendis, Consilio, induforo lato, sanctoque senatu; Cui res audacter magnas, parvasque, joc.u.mque Eloqueret, quae tincta maleis, et quae bona dictu Evomeret, si quid vellet, tutoque locaret.

Quoc.u.m multa volup ac gaudia clamque palamque.

Ingenium cui nulla malum sententia suadet, Ut faceret facinus; lenis tamen, haud malus; idem Doctus, fidelis, suavis h.o.m.o, facundus, suoque Contentus, scitus, atque beatus, secunda loquens in Tempore commodus, et verborum vir paucorum.

Multa tenens antiqua sepulta, et saepe vetustas Quae facit, et mores veteresque novosque tenentem Multorum veterum leges, divumque hominumque Prudentem, qui multa loquive, tacereve possit.

Hunc inter pugnas compellat Servilius sic(193)."

The eighth and ninth books of these Annals, which are much mutilated, detailed the events of the second Carthaginian war in Italy and Africa.

This was by much the most interesting part of the copious subject which Ennius had chosen, and a portion of it on which he would probably exert all the force of his genius, in order the more to honour his friend and patron Scipio Africa.n.u.s. The same topic was selected by Silius Italicus, and by Petrarch for his Latin poem _Africa_, which obtained him a coronation in the Capitol. "Ennius," says the ill.u.s.trious Italian, "has sung fully of Scipio; but, in the opinion of Valerius Maximus, his style is harsh and vulgar, and there is yet no elegant poem which has for its subject the glorious exploits of the conqueror of Hannibal." None of the poets who have chosen this topic, have done full justice to the most arduous struggle in which two powerful nations had ever engaged, and which presented the most splendid display of military genius on the one hand, and heroic virtue on the other, that had yet been exhibited to the world.

Livy's historical account of the second Punic war possesses more real poetry than any poem on the subject whatever.

The tenth, eleventh, and twelfth books of the Annals of Ennius, contained the war with Philip of Macedon. In the commencement of the thirteenth, Hannibal excites Antiochus to a war against the Romans. In the fourteenth book, the Consul Scipio, in the prosecution of this contest, arrives at Ilium, which he thus apostrophizes:

"O patria! O divum domus Ilium, et incluta bello Pergama!"

Several Latin writers extol the elegant lines of Ennius immediately following, in which the Roman soldiers, alluding to its magnificent revival in Rome, exclaim with enthusiasm, that Ilium could not be destroyed;

"Quai neque Dardaneeis campeis potuere perire, Nec quom capta capei, nec quom combusta cremari(194);"

a pa.s.sage which has been closely imitated in the seventh book of Virgil:

"Num Sigeis occ.u.mbere campis, Num capti potuere capi: num incensa cremavit Troja viros?"

The fifteenth book related the expedition of Fulvius n.o.bilior to aetolia, which Ennius himself is said to have accompanied. In the two following books he prosecuted the Istrian war; which concludes with the following animated description of a single hero withstanding the attack of an armed host:-

"Undique conveniunt, velut imber, tela Tribuno.

Configunt parmam, tinnit hastilibus umbo, aeratae sonitant galeae: sed nec pote quisquam Undique nitendo corpus discerpere ferro.

Semper abundanteis hastas frangitque, quat.i.tque; Totum sudor habet corpus, moltumque laborat; Nec respirandi fit copia praepete ferro.

Istrei tela manu jacientes sollicitabant.

Occ.u.mbunt moltei leto, ferroque lapique, Aut intra moeros, aut extra praecipi casu(195)."

The concluding, or eighteenth, book seems to have been in a great measure personal to the poet himself. It explains his motive for writing:-

-- "Omnes mortales sese laudarier optant;" --

and he seemingly compares himself to a Courser, who rests after his triumphs in the Olympic games:-

"Sic ut fortis Equus, spatio qui saepe supremo Vicit Olumpiaco, nunc senio confectus quiescit(196)."

Connected with his Annals, there was a poem of Ennius devoted to the celebration of the exploits of Scipio, in which occurs a much-admired description of the calm of Evening, where the flow of the versification is finely modulated to the still and solemn imagery:-

"Mundus cli vastus const.i.tit silentio, Et Neptunus saevus undeis aspereis pausam dedit: Sol equeis iter repressit unguleis volantibus, Const.i.tere amneis perenneis-arbores vento vacant(197)."

Click Like and comment to support us!

RECENTLY UPDATED NOVELS

About History of Roman Literature from its Earliest Period to the Augustan Volume I Part 5 novel

You're reading History of Roman Literature from its Earliest Period to the Augustan by Author(s): John Dunlop. This novel has been translated and updated at LightNovelsOnl.com and has already 644 views. And it would be great if you choose to read and follow your favorite novel on our website. We promise you that we'll bring you the latest novels, a novel list updates everyday and free. LightNovelsOnl.com is a very smart website for reading novels online, friendly on mobile. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at [email protected] or just simply leave your comment so we'll know how to make you happy.