Second Shetland Truck System Report - LightNovelsOnl.com
You're reading novel online at LightNovelsOnl.com. Please use the follow button to get notifications about your favorite novels and its latest chapters so you can come back anytime and won't miss anything.
16,013. Would you say that J. & R. Morley & Co.; Copestake, Moore, & Co.; Stewart & M'Donald, Glasgow; Fletcher & Sons, Manchester; J. & W. Campbell, Glasgow; Arthur & Co., Glasgow; Mann, Byars, & Co. Glasgow; George Peek, Manchester, Vesey & Sons, London; Allan & French, London, were second-cla.s.s houses?-No; but I should like to know the extent of business which the merchants here do with them, and whether they deal wholesale with them or not.
16,014. Would you be surprised to hear that Shetland merchants engaged in the hosiery trade obtain the bulk of their goods from such houses as these?-I should say that perhaps that was the truth, but I should like to know the whole truth about the matter, because [Page 406] these houses, large as they may be, have certain clearances occasionally, which it may suit a people such as those of Shetland to take. I know at least one instance of a large quant.i.ty of that cla.s.s of goods coming down in the steamer, and being damaged by a cask of porter being burst upon them, and a claim was made upon the Leith and Clyde s.h.i.+pping Co. for something like 50 per cent. of profit, because it was a job lot which had been bought from big houses of that kind.
16,015. But I suppose there are job lots bought by almost every house at times?-Yes, but that has been the system here; in fact it has been stated by people in these big businesses, that they did get rid of their over-season's goods in that way.
16,016. I suppose over-season's goods come to all parts of the rural districts of Scotland?-I am not aware of that, but they may do so.
16,017. Is there anything else you wish to say?-Nothing that I am aware of.
Lerwick, January 30, 1872, CHARLES OLLASON, examined.
16,018. You are a member of the firm of Charles Ollason & Son, bootmakers, Lerwick?-Yes.
16,019. Did you receive that letter [showing] from Mr.
Williamson?-Yes. [The following letter was put in:-]
'Haggersta, Jan. 20th 71.'
'Messrs. Charles Ollason & Son.
'Dear Sirs,-I am sorry to say that by some misunderstanding I did not get the wages that I expected to get; for instead of a 3/4th I only got a 1/2 share, and therefore instead of 18 I only got 12. I was due Mr. Stove 4 from the year that I was at the fis.h.i.+ng from him, and he handed in that bill against me to Mr. Irvine, who retained that for him, so in that way I had nothing to get at all.
Therefore I am sorry to say that I cannot pay the 15s. that I am due you for the boots that I got in August, and I beg that you will wait till the turn of the season, and then I hope that I will be able to pay you, for I am signed to go in the 'Olive' as a sharesman. If you cannot wait till then, you will be so good as to let me know. You will make out a bill, and I will sign it and hand it in to Mr. Irvine, and let it be marked against me, and then you will be sure of your money then-for it is entirely out of my power to pay you any other way just now. I beg that you will comply with my request, as I can't do better.-Your humble Debtor,
'M. Williamson, 'Haggersta, 'Whiteness.'
16,020. Was that letter written to you by him in answer to a demand for payment of your account?-Yes.
16,021. Were you surprised to get a letter of that kind explaining the reasons why your account was not paid?-We were not very much surprised, for we believed the facts to be just as he stated them.
16,022. Did you think it a reasonable enough explanation he was not able to pay you?-Yes; it was reasonable enough for him.
Lerwick, January 30, 1872, JOHN WALKER, recalled.
16,023. I now show you Messrs. Hay & Co.'s store ledger, kept by William Halcrow, their storekeeper here: was Halcrow the party referred to in the report which you mentioned in your evidence?- If Messrs. Hay & Co. say he is their superintendent, he is the same individual.
16,024. Is Messrs. Hay & Co.'s the largest establishment of that kind in Lerwick?-I understand so.
16,025. And the party mentioned in the report describes himself as superintendent of the largest establishment in this place?-Yes, general superintendent, and the other is described as the manager of the working department. The general superintendent is the one who signs his name, and the other is the one who signs with a cross, and they are the parties who speak about the resources of science and art.
16,026. Is the book I now show you kept in a fair enough mercantile hand?-Fair enough.
16,027. Would, you be surprised to hear that it was kept by William Halcrow?-I would not. The reason why I mentioned this matter at all was to show the subserviency of the people in Shetland,-that they are accustomed to do what they are bidden,- that they are ready to sign their names to what they really cannot understand, if they think it is doing a favour to any one above them.
16,028. Do you think Halcrow was incapable of understanding such a phrase as the resources of science and art?-I think so, as it is applied here; because I may mention that in the correspondence which pa.s.sed before, and which refers to the same parties, they said they did not know that whales had skins.
Lerwick, January 30, 1872, ARTHUR LAURENSON, recalled.
16,029. I understand you have heard the evidence which has been given by Mr. Walker with regard to the merchants in Lerwick, and that you wish to make some explanation in regard to it?-I have not heard it, but the substance of it has been reported to me since I entered the room. I have been told that he said that the merchants in Lerwick buy from second-cla.s.s houses, and pay for their goods by consignments of hosiery. I wish to refute that, so far as I am concerned; and I refer to Messrs. J. & W. Campbell, Glasgow; Stewart & M'Donald, Glasgow; Arthur & Co., Glasgow; John Clapperton & Co., Glasgow, and Geo. Peek & Co., Manchester, as a proof that I deal with first-cla.s.s houses.
16,030. Are these the only houses with which you deal?-No; I deal with a good many more.
16,031. Are there any houses from which you get portions of your goods which might be characterized as second-cla.s.s houses?-No.
16,032. Is it the case that you ever get job lots or over-seasons goods?-Never, unless in the ordinary way of trade. Perhaps an article may be shown to me by a traveller occasionally, but only one pattern out of fifty which may be described as a job lot.
16,033. You do not get in a larger proportion of these goods than other dealers in other country towns?-No; I never bought a job lot altogether in my life. We never pay by consignments of hosiery.
16,034. Is there anything further you wish to state?-At the close of my last examination I wished to make objection to the credibility of a witness. I was asked to state it privately, and I now hand in paper with regard to it. [Produces paper.]
Lerwick, January 30, 1872, ROBERT SINCLAIR, recalled.
16,035. Do you wish to concur with Mr. Laurenson in the statement which he has now made?-Yes. The only difference is that I deal with more houses in London.
16,036. The list of houses which I read from in putting a question to Mr. Walker was furnished by you?-Yes; but it does not include one half of the houses that I deal with. I wish also to say that I have now been 25 years in business, and I never to this day exchanged 2d. worth of hosiery goods for goods in the [Page 407]
south. I do not mean to say that I have not bought hosiery goods for goods here, but I have never exchanged them in the south for other goods.*
16,037. Does any one present wish to give any further evidence?- [No answer.] Then I adjourn this inquiry. I have to think the Commissioners of Supply for the use of this room, which they have kindly furnished to me; and I have also to return my thanks to all parties in Shetland with whom I have met, for the courtesy which I have received from them, and for the readiness which they have shown in furnis.h.i.+ng me with all information which I required.
*Mr. Linklater also, on the same day, sent the following letter to the Commissioner, referring to the same subject:-
LERWICK, 31st January 1872.
W. GUTHRIE, Esq.
Sir,-I am sorry that I was absent when Mr. Walker in his evidence before you today stated, as I have been told, that the merchants here bartered their goods in exchange for drapery goods from second-cla.s.s warehouses in the south. I beg to state that I have been thirty-seven years in business here, and have paid cash for all the goods ever I bought, and beg to refer you to the following houses from whom I get my goods.-I am, sir, yours very respectfully,
ROBERT LINKLATER.
J. & W. Campbell & Co., Glasgow; Stewart & M'Donald, Glasgow; Arthur & Co., Glasgow; Anderson & Co., Glasgow; J.
Clapperton & Co., Glasgow; Chamberlain & Birrell, Glasgow; John Howell & Co., St. Paul s, London; Fandel, Phillips, & Co., Newgate Street, London; Hutton & Co., Newgate Street, London; D. Hyam, Houndsditch, London; Copestake, Moore, & Co., London; George Peek & Co, Manchester; Hall, Russell, & Co., Bradford.
LERWICK: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1872
-MR GUTHRIE.
Lerwick, February 5, 1872, Mrs. JOAN WINWICK or FORDYCE, examined. 16,038. Do you live in Chromate Lane, Lerwick?-Yes. 16,039. Is your husband alive?-Yes. He is a pensioner. He was a carpenter to trade, but he does nothing now. 16,040. Do you knit worsted work?-Yes, I knit, but for myself only. I knit with my own wool, and sell the goods. 16,041. Have you never knitted with merchants' wool?-No.
