Religion and Science - LightNovelsOnl.com
You're reading novel online at LightNovelsOnl.com. Please use the follow button to get notifications about your favorite novels and its latest chapters so you can come back anytime and won't miss anything.
[38] Darwin, _Life_, Vol. I, p. 93.
[39] "If we wish to fix a definite point to describe as the end of the idealistic period in Germany, no such distinctive event offers itself as the French Revolution of July, 1830" (Lange, _History of Materialism_, E.T., Vol. II, p. 245).
[40] A famous book which, though negative in its conclusions, places its author alongside Schleiermacher as one of the founders of the modern science of Religious Psychology.
[41] Balfour, _Theism and Humanism_, p. 36.
[42] "Evolution is an integration of matter and concomitant dissipation of motion, during which the matter pa.s.ses from an indefinite incoherent h.o.m.ogeneity to a definite coherent heterogeneity, and during which the retained motion undergoes a parallel transformation."
[43] Spencer confessed that of the _Synthetic Philosophy_ "two volumes are missing," the two important volumes on Inorganic Evolution, leading to the evolution of the living and of the non-living (cf. criticisms by Professor James Ward in his _Naturalism and Agnosticism_, Lecture IX).
[44] For an instance of the masterly work turned out by this school and of the attractiveness of their propaganda, read Huxley's lecture, "On a Piece of Chalk," delivered to the working men of Norwich during the meeting of the British a.s.sociation in 1868.
[45] For this famous encounter, see _Life of Huxley_, Vol. I, pp.
179-89, and _Life of J. R. Green_, pp. 44, 45.
[46] As we shall subsequently find, this cosmic pessimism is less well grounded than Huxley believed. Still, Spencer's own scientific presuppositions were the same as Huxley's, so that the pa.s.sage remains a pertinent criticism of the Evolutionary Philosophy as elaborated by him.
[47] It is instructive to observe that a similar note of latent pessimism is struck by the last notable survivor of the School we have endeavoured to describe. Viscount Morley at the end of his _Recollections_ (1917), questioned as to the outcome of those generous hopes entertained with such confidence by his contemporaries, is compelled to e.j.a.c.u.l.a.t.e with philosophic brevity, _circ.u.mspice_, as he contemplates a spectacle of unparalleled horror.
[48] Storr, _Development of English Theology in the Nineteenth Century_, p. 329. See which book for a valuable chapter upon Coleridge.
[49] _Foundations of Belief_, p. 98.
[50] _Foundations of Belief_, p. 309.
[51] For this summary of Lotze's doctrine, see Merz, Vol. III, p. 615 and ff.
[52] Quoted by Ward in _Pluralism and Theism_, p. 103. For a brief yet adequate treatment of Mach's criticisms see Hoffding's _Modern Philosophers_, pp. 115-21.
[53] R. B. Perry, _Present Philosophical Tendencies_, p. 351.
[54] It is impossible to go deeper into James' "theory of knowledge"
without using technical language. A few of his own phrases, however, may help to elucidate things. "Abstract concepts ... are salient aspects of our concrete experiences which we find it useful to single out"
(_Meaning of Truth_, p. 246).
Elsewhere he speaks of them as things we have learned to "cut out" from experience, as "flowers gathered," and as "moments dipped out from the stream of time" (_A Pluralistic Universe_, p. 235).
I owe these quotations to Perry, op. cit.
[55] _Creative Evolution_, p. 325.
[56] _A Pluralistic Universe_, p. 237.
[57] _Creative Evolution_, p. 174.
[58] i.e. Intellect is not (as it is generally represented to be) a developed form of instinct, nor instinct an embryonic form of intellect.
[59] The extraordinary and miraculous phenomena of instinct--especially as celebrated by the distinguished French scientist Fabre--cannot be rightly understood by trying to interpret them in terms of intellect.
This is to misread them completely.
[60] Bergson's characterisation of Spencerian Evolutionism (_Creative Evolution_, p. 391).
[61] _Creative Evolution_, p. 286.
[62] Other notable pluralists in England are F. C. S. Schiller and Dr.
MacTaggart.
[63] The _logical_ conclusion, we say, though this may not be the ultimate truth about the matter. The most attractive theories are often the most superficial.
[64] Professor Cunningham in Pearson's _Grammar of Science_, Part I, p.
356.
[65] Quoted by W. C. D. Whetham in his _Recent Development of Physical Science_, p. 280. No reference is given by him.
[66] One theory attributes the existence of matter to occasional misfits among these grains.
[67] Quoted by Bishop Mercer. _Problem of Creation_, Appendix B.
[68] In _Theism and Humanism_.
[69] Mercer, op. cit., p. 106.
[70] _Mechanism, Life, and Personality_ (1913), p. 81.
[71] Op. cit. pp. 64, 66.
[72] Professor J. Arthur Thomson, in an article ent.i.tled, "Is there one Science of Nature?" (_Hibbert Journal_, Oct., 1911).
[73] _The Science and Philosophy of the Organism_, Vol. II, p. 338.
[74] Op. cit. p. 101.
[75] Other names of distinguished scientists holding this view are: Sir W. Crookes the Physicist and Sir W. F. Barrett, F.R.S., in England, Dr.
Hodgson and Prof. James Hyslop in America, Lombroso in Italy, Richet in France.
[76] From his _Duplik_. Quoted by Hoffding, _History of Philosophy_, Vol. II, p. 21.
[77] F. H. Bradley on "Phenomenalism" (_Appearance and Reality_, p.
126).
[78] Hoffding, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 129.
[79] Feuerbach, _Essence of Christianity_, p. 21.
[80] We now learn that conceptions of s.p.a.ce of a highly unorthodox character are entertained by physicists and mathematicians, as the result of recent researches in the sphere of the gravitation of light.
