The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments Part 8

Dr. St. George Mivert, late professor of biology in the University College of Kensington, calls Darwinism a "puerile hypothesis."

Dr. James Orr, of Edinburg University, says: "The greatest scientists and theologians of Europe are now p.r.o.nouncing Darwinism to be absolutely dead."

Dr. Traas, a famous palaeontologist, concludes: "The idea that mankind is descended from any simian species whatever, is certainly the most foolish ever put forth by a man writing on the history of man." Does this apply to H. G. Wells?

Dr. N. S. Shaler, professor of Geol., in Harvard University, said: "It is not yet proved that a single species of the two or three millions, now inhabiting the earth had been established solely or mainly, by the operation of natural selection."

Prof. Haeckel, a most extreme evolutionist, confesses: "Most modern investigators of science have come to the conclusion that the doctrine of evolution, and particularly Darwinism, is an error, and can not be maintained."

Prof. Huxley, said that evolution is "not proved and not provable."

Sir Charles Bell, Prof, of the University College of London, says: "Everything declares the species to have their origin in a distinct creation, not in a gradual variation from some original type."

These testimonies of scientists of the first rank are a part of a large number. Many of them and many more, are given in Prof.

Townsend's "Collapse of Evolution," McCann's "G.o.d or Gorilla," Philip Mauro's "Evolution At the Bar," and other anti-evolution books. Alfred McCann, in his great work, "G.o.d or Gorilla," mentions 20 of the most prominent scholars, who do not accept Darwinism. Yet they say, "All scholars accept evolution"!!

UNSOLICITED TESTIMONIALS

Agents for this 20,000 edition may show these selections, culled from a ma.s.s of warm world-wide testimonials, by able critics, authors, professors, editors, magazines, reviews, governors of states, and rulers of nations. "Unanswerable;" "an absolute demonstration;"

"masterful;" "true to t.i.tle;" "clear and convincing;" "scholarly and logical;" "timely;" "terse;" "interesting;" "best I ever read;" "costs $1, worth $5;" "fully disproves evolution;" also:--

"I finished your book today at two sittings. It is the most effective polemic on the subject, I have yet seen. You have marshalled the evidence of mathematics against the delusion of man's descent from brute ancestry, with telling effect."--PHILIP MAURO, Noted Attorney and Author.

"Evolution Disproved is not only a strong book from the scientific and argumentative viewpoint, but is also unique in many ways. We wish everybody would and could read it, especially those who are enamored with Evolution."--PROF. L. S. KEYSER, D.D., in the Bible Champion.

"Evolution Disproved is a sober, fully sustained and very remarkable book vindicating its t.i.tle. It surely is one of the most conclusive of books, tearing to shreds Evolution pretensions. Absolutely unanswerable; in the very front rank of masterly books."--THE METHODIST.

"I have, for a third of a century, made Evolution a study, but Evolution Disproved really refutes the fallacy more completely than any other that I have seen. Some rich man should give it to 20,000,000 families."--REV. C. W. BIBB, N.Y.

"You certainly have given a masterful treatment of this subject."--C. L. HUSTON, Chairman Com. on Evangelism, Pres. Church, U.S.A.

"Interessante" (French).--President of the Swiss Confederation.

"Filled with valuable matter systematically arranged; cogent."--S.S.

TIMES, Philadelphia.

"He shows the evolution of the soul to be impossible."--W. R. MOODY, in Record of Christian Work.

"Unexcelled for brevity, clarity and intensity. A compendium of facts."--W.C.F.A., which accordingly rewarded the author with honorary members.h.i.+p.

"The arguments amount to a demonstration."--LUTHERAN, Phila.

"The greatest book of its kind."--PROF. M. F. LARKIN, head of the International Textbook Co., Scranton, Pa.

"A very informing book."--Bp. NUELSEN'S, Sec., Zurich.

"A most remarkable book."--THE LUTHERANEREN (Danish)

"A vigorous book; a lively volume."--BELFAST (Ireland) NEWS.

"A strong argument."--GUERNSEY PRESS, Eng.

"A very remarkable and provocative book; shows patent evidence of large research and shrewd thinking."--COURIER, Dundee, Scotland.

"I congratulate you on this scientific work so full of thought."--H.

SEIPEL, Chancellor of Austria,

"An excellent book."--Librarian of Ravenna University, Italy.

"An interesting attack on evolution."--Teachers World, London, Eng.

"A very excellent book."--REV. D. D. MARSH, Ont., Can.

"The best I ever saw."--R. A. McKINNEY, G. A. Com. of 100.

"Irrefutable; displays unusual information."--Dr. D.S. Clark. Phila.

"He writes from a new angle with great ability."--Luth. Church Her.

"Should do much good."--REV. F. HAMILTON, Pyongyang, Korea.

"I count your book a remarkably strong one. It clearly disproves every claim of Darwinism."--DR. H. B. RILEY, President W.C.F.A.

"Of all books against evolution, the most unique. Its arguments are effective and deadly, c.u.mulative and convincing."--Bibliotheca Sacra.

"Our first order, 60 copies."--BIBLE UNION, Cape Town, S. Africa.

"Thanks" for EVOLUTION DISPROVED have been received from HUNDREDS of foreign librarians and national rulers. Write what YOU think!

PART TWO

EVIDENCE ANSWERED

29. PALEONTOLOGY

1. The PITHECANTHROPUS, which is a high sounding name for an ape-man (from Grk. pithekos, ape, and anthropos, man) was found by Dr. Dubois, an ardent evolutionist, in 1892, in Trinil in the island of Java. It lived, it is said, 750,000 years ago. He found, buried in the Pleistocene beds, 40 feet below the surface in the sand, _the upper portion of a skull, a tooth and a thigh bone_. "It was fortunate," says Dr. Chapin, "that the most distinctive portions of the human (sic) frame should have been preserved, because from these specimens, we are able to reconstruct (?) the being, and to say with a.s.surance (!) that his walk was erect in manlike posture, that he had mental power considerably above the ape, (it will not do to be too definite) and his powers of speech were somewhat limited. (A string of guesses wholly unwarranted.) This man stood half way between the anthropoid and the existing men."--Social Evolution, p. 61.

A high authority declares,--"Shortly after this discovery, 24 of the most eminent scientists of Europe met. Ten said that the bones belonged to an ape; 7, to a man; and 7 (less than one-third) said they were a missing link." Some of the most eminent scientists say that some of the bones belong to a man, and some to an ape, baboon, or monkey. The great Prof. Virchow says: "There is no evidence at all that these bones were parts of the same creature." But such adverse opinions do not weigh much with modern evolutionists determined to win at all hazards.