The Cultural History of Marlborough, Virginia - LightNovelsOnl.com
You're reading novel online at LightNovelsOnl.com. Please use the follow button to get notifications about your favorite novels and its latest chapters so you can come back anytime and won't miss anything.
59.1680 Steel scissors (ill. 61)
59.1681 Large fishhook (ill. 88)
59.1682 Chalk bullet mold (fig. 84b, ill. 51)
59.1685 Slate pencil (fig. 85d, ill. 54)
59.1687 Octagonal spirits bottle (fig. 80)
59.1688 Wine bottle: seal "I^[C.]M 1737" (fig. 78, ill. 37)
59.1679 Handle sherd of North Devon gravel-tempered earthenware (ill. 15)
59.1698 Buckley high-fired, black-glazed earthenware (fig. 65)
59.1699 Buckley high-fired, amber-glazed earthenware pan sherds (fig. 65, ills. 17 and 18)
59.1700 Brown-decorated yellowware cup or posset-pot sherds (fig.
64c, ill. 16)
59.1701 Nottingham-type brown-glazed fine stoneware sherds (fig.
67a)
59.1762 Sherd of Westerwald blue-and-gray stoneware, with part of "GR" medallion showing (fig. 66d)
59.1704 Large sherds of brown-glazed Tidewater-type earthenware pan (fig. 63a, ill. 11)
59.1706 Blue-and-white delft plate, Lambeth, ca. 1720 (fig. 69)
59.1707 Blue-and-white delft plate, [?]Bristol, ca. 1750 (fig. 70)
59.1714 Kaolin tobacco-pipe bowls, and one wholly reconstructed pipe (fig. 84f, ill. 53)
59.1715 Steel springtrap for small animals (ill. 86)
(Also numerous sherds of Staffords.h.i.+re white salt-glazed ware and creamware. A single disparate sherd of pink, transfer-printed Staffords.h.i.+re ware, dating from about 1835, is the only intrusive artifact in the deposit.)
The bones were virtually all pork refuse, except for a few rabbit bones.
The oystersh.e.l.ls, found in every refuse deposit, reflect the universal taste for the then-abundant oyster.
[Ill.u.s.tration: Figure 55.--REFUSE FOUND AT EXTERIOR CORNER of Wall A-II and Wall D.]
The significance of the structure is not clear. It was probably the site of a privy, the remaining bricks having been part of a brick floor in front of the pit.
STRUCTURE G
A few feet southeast of Structure D, another much smaller pit was found, surrounded on two sides by a partial-U-shaped single row and single course of bricks. This brickwork measured 5 feet in length, with a 4-foot appendage at one end and a 7-foot appendage at the other. The pit was small and shallow. Typical ceramic artifacts were found, as well as fragments of black basaltes ware (ill. 32) and some early 19th-century whiteware. The function of this pit is unknown.
PIT AT JUNCTION OF WALLS A-II AND D
Just north of the northeast corner of the wall system a small trash pit was uncovered. It contained a scattering of wine- and gin-bottle sherds, a few miscellaneous, small, ceramic-tableware fragments, and about one-third of a blue-and-white Chinese porcelain plate (figs. 55 and 77).
UNIDENTIFIED FOUNDATION NEAR POTOMAC CREEK (STRUCTURE H)
About 60 feet from the sh.o.r.e of Potomac Creek, at the southeast corner of the old road that runs from the highway to the creek, bordered by Wall A, were indications of a brick foundation. This structure was explored to the extent of its width (about 15 feet) for a distance northward of 17 feet, then the east wall was traced 22 feet farther north until it disappeared into the bankside and a thicket. The excavated area disclosed quant.i.ties of brickbats, a layer of soil, a number of burnt bricks, a layer of black charcoal ash, and a 6-inch deposit of clay. The brick walls were 1.5 feet thick. The structure had been built into the hillside, so that the north end was presumably a deep bas.e.m.e.nt.
[Ill.u.s.tration: Figure 56.--EXCAVATION PLAN of Structure H.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: Figure 57.--STRUCTURE H, from Potomac Creek sh.o.r.e, looking northeast.]
Artifacts were few. A complete scythe (fig. 90) was found embedded in the clay above the brickwork on the east side of the structure, and next to it a large body sherd of black-glazed Buckley ware. A few small ceramic sherds occurred--pieces of redware with trailed slip (fig. 64), and small bits of delft, salt glaze, and Chinese porcelain.
The location and implied shape of the building suggest that it had a utilitarian purpose. Near the waterfront, it would conveniently have served as a warehouse, or possibly as either the brewhouse or malthouse, each described by Mercer as having been 100 feet long, of brick and stone. Whether one was of brick and the other of stone, or both were brick and stone in combination, is not clear. There was no evidence of stonework in Structure H. On the other hand, the 100-foot-long rectangular stone enclosure, of which Wall A formed a part, shows no evidence of brickwork. The purposes of both these structures must, for now, remain unexplained, but a.s.sociation with the brewery seems plausible.
XIV
_Stafford Courthouse South of Potomac Creek_
INTRODUCTION
The chief archeological problem of Marlborough at the time of excavation was whether or not Structure B had served as the foundation for both the courthouse and for John Mercer's mansion. Although the possibility still remains that the sites of the two buildings overlapped, preceding chapters have demonstrated that the foundation was constructed by Mercer for his house, and that it did not stand beneath the courthouse.
However, in 1957 it was thought that exploration of the late-18th-century courthouse site, located upstream on the south side of Potomac Creek, might reveal a structure of similar dimensions which would help to confirm the possibility that Structure B had originated with the Marlborough courthouse. Furthermore, the Potomac Creek site was of interest by itself and was closely related to John Mercer's legal and judicial career.
The location of the site is depicted in surveys included with suit papers of 1743 and 1805.[160] These papers were brought to our attention by George H. S. King of Fredericksburg, and were mentioned in Happel's carefully doc.u.mented history of the Stafford and King George courthouses.[161] Previously, we had been led to the site by a former sheriff of Stafford County, who recalled listening as a boy to descriptions of the old courthouse building by an ancient whose memory went back to the early years of the 19th century. The old man's recollections, in turn, were reinforced by similar recountings of elders in his own youth. Unscientific though the value of such information may be, it emerges from folk memories that often remain sharp and clear in rural areas, spanning in the minds of two or three individuals the periods of several conventional generations. As clues, at least, they are never to be ignored. In this case we were taken to a rubble-strewn site on an eminence that overlooks Potomac Creek. At the foot of a declivity below, on the old Belle Plains road, we were shown another obvious evidence of structure, which we were told had been the jail.
Just to the east of this where a road leads away to the site of Cave's tobacco warehouse (now the "Stone Landing"), we were informed that the stocks had once stood.
Of the latter two sites we have no confirming evidence, although both claims are plausible enough. No archeological effort was made to investigate them, since funds were limited. The surveys of 1743 and 1805 are sufficient to confirm with accuracy the courthouse site.
Accordingly, an archeological exploration was made between August 19 and August 23, 1957, revealing unmistakably the footings of a courthouse. As will be shown, these footings in no way bore a resemblance to the Structure B foundation.
FOOTNOTES:
[160] Fredericksburg Suit Papers, 1745-1805 (MS., Fredericksburg, Virginia, courthouse).
[161] HAPPEL, op. cit. (footnote 22), pp. 183-194.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The history of the Potomac Creek courthouse site has been presented thoroughly by Happel, but a brief review is in order here. Happel shows that a courthouse was ordered built in 1665, a year after the establishment of Stafford as a county. He quotes a court reference in 1667 to the road along the south sh.o.r.e of Potomac Creek, running from the "said Ferry," near the head of the Creek, "to the Court house to the horse Bridge," which he identifies as having spanned Pa.s.sapatanzy Gut.
In his opinion, this courthouse was near the mouth of the Creek, but he fails to show that it equally well may have been near the site of the later 18th-century structures.