The Wonderful Story of Washington Part 9

II. SOMETIMES TOO LATE TO MEND

The English parliament, becoming suddenly aware of the growing power in the American subjects, now conceded every right asked for by the colonists, and enacted those rights into law. But it was too late. The middle-cla.s.s ma.s.s of property owners and business men began to see the vision of an American republic and the tide swelled toward success. As the cutting off of supplies from the colonies had been the chief cause of American weakness, England tried to prevent supplies being sent to America, with the result that Denmark, Sweden, Russia and Holland declared an armed neutrality to enforce their right to sell military supplies to America. The dispute led to a war with Holland in 1780, so that by the close of that year Great Britain had not a friend on earth and was confronted by the united armies and navies of France, Spain, Holland and America. At the same time there was rebellion in India against the English rule, insurrections in Ireland, and so deep the discontent in England itself that a London mob was able for several days to make itself master of the city. The English lost control of the sea before the close of 1780, and on October 19, 1781, Cornwallis surrendered his army to Was.h.i.+ngton, from which historic hour a world-champion of the rights of man over the divine rights of kings was born in the Western world.

The difficulties which Was.h.i.+ngton had encountered and overcome in Virginia previous to the French and Indian war were in full exercise throughout New England at the opening of the Revolutionary War. They could act together in small, free groups for a particular object of their will, but to obey superior officers and to sacrifice their own private judgment to higher authority, which was so necessary in war and such a war as this, was utterly repugnant to their dispositions.

That subserviency to authority was the very reason they were opposing the idea of taxation without representation, and why should they be required to do the very thing they were fighting against! That quandary and query has been the puzzle of every mind unable to see the vision of means necessary to future results. It is the blindness always of the fanatical pacifist who would sacrifice nothing for peace, and of the non-resistant doctrine that right and moral law have no need for material might in a material world.

The colonists had never known of anything but local patriotism. They seemed to be unable to distinguish between English king-made authority and American people-made authority, notwithstanding how much had been discussed the relations of representation and taxation. That difficulty has always existed concerning American militarism. It almost defeated Lincoln during the Civil War. It almost delivered the Union to Secession. If democratic militarism cannot be different from dynastic militarism, then American freedom and human liberty will be lost in the next American or world war.

The colonist would fight with the heroism he displayed in Indian warfare, but when the enemy was driven away from his neighborhood, it was the duty of the next neighborhood to take care of itself. Besides, the New Englander with a home had the same idea as the Virginian soldier twenty years before, and this was that, when he wanted to go home, why shouldn't he! He was not a deserter, and in no sense a coward, but the discipline of army service was mere enslavement and any compulsion was despotism. To understand the making up of an efficient army under such circ.u.mstances is the only measure to estimate the greatness of Was.h.i.+ngton and the debt to him of the liberty-loving world.

Curtis, in his history of American Commonwealth, says, "Was.h.i.+ngton overcame these difficulties by dint of a patience and a selflessness almost without parallel in history, which gradually communicated itself to his fellow countrymen. In seven years he created a continental army which ended the war at Yorktown."

III. SELECTING THE LEADER OF LIBERTY FOR AMERICA

Was.h.i.+ngton had to write many letters, endeavoring to spur up the really patriotic leaders to consistent work for the cause. In his letter to Joseph Reed he was almost in despair over the indifference of people from whom he expected the most patriotic service.

"It grieves me," he wrote, "to see so little of that patriotic spirit which I was taught to believe characteristic of this people." But this did not mean that the so-called "spirit of '76" was not strong among them. Was.h.i.+ngton needed so much of the patriotic spirit that a little would not be any, and, to half-heal the wounds of a friend, was not very friendly to the cause, nor a sufficient friends.h.i.+p toward the needs of Was.h.i.+ngton's work for America.

Ten years later, when Was.h.i.+ngton had matured, through the mind-making experiences of revolutionary times, he wrote to John Jay, saying, "Experience has taught us that men will not adopt and carry into execution measures the best calculated for their own good without the intervention of coercive power." This meant that human society requires law, and the right of law is devoid of appreciation or application unless it is clothed with the might to keep its forms and values true.

Lecky says, "The common saying that you cannot make people virtuous by law is a dangerous half-truth. The virtue innate in a people may be utterly destroyed by bad inst.i.tutions, for 'the virtue,' as Jay wrote to Was.h.i.+ngton, 'like the other resources of a country, can only be drawn to a point by strong circ.u.mstances ably managed, or strong governments ably administered.'"

When it came to a question of who should be commander-in-chief of all the armies, the disruptions and jealousies of the sections seemed dangerously near wrecking any united action, which obviously must be fatal to any independence more than they then had from Great Britain.

The Southern leaders were unanimous for Was.h.i.+ngton, and, with the efficiency of shrewd politicians, supported measures largely according to the pressure they brought to bear in the cause of having Was.h.i.+ngton for the commander-in-chief. But this support did not bring together any antagonism, because it was not made by any faction of admirers or supporters. Was.h.i.+ngton himself, though present, refused to lend any aid to the presentation of his own name.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Mount Vernon--Was.h.i.+ngton's Residence, Virginia.]

It was John Adams, the whole-souled patriot from Ma.s.sachusetts who was the leader in advocating the selection of Was.h.i.+ngton. In his diary, during these consequential times, Adams wrote, "I had no hesitation to declare that I had but one gentleman in my mind for that important command, and that was a gentleman from Virginia, who was among us, and very well known to us; a gentleman whose skilled experience as an officer, whose independent fortune, great talents, and excellent universal character would command the approbation of all America, and unite the cordial exertions of all the colonies better than any other person in the Union."

There were many men who were able leaders, and who had already made great sacrifices in the cause of liberty, who believed with their friends that they were ent.i.tled to be selected for the head of the Army. Nevertheless, when the nomination was made, the election by ballot was unanimous for Was.h.i.+ngton.

The salary of Commander-in-Chief had been set at five hundred dollars a month, but Was.h.i.+ngton in his address of acceptance, while declaring that no salary could have been made large enough to tempt him from the comforts and business interests of his home, said he would accept no salary, but would keep an exact account of his expenses, which they would no doubt refund to him.

"There is something charming to me," said John Adams, who became the second president of the United States, when writing at the time to a friend, "in the conduct of Was.h.i.+ngton, a gentleman of one of the first fortunes upon the continent, leaving his delicious retirement, his family and friends, sacrificing his ease, and hazarding all in the cause of his country. His views are n.o.ble and disinterested."

Was.h.i.+ngton now wrote to his half-brother, Augustine Was.h.i.+ngton, a characteristic letter.

"I am now to bid adieu to you, and to every kind of domestic ease for a while. I am embarked on a wide ocean, boundless in its prospect, and in which, perhaps, no safe harbor is to be found. I have been called upon by the unanimous voice of the Colonies to take command of the Continental army; an honor I neither sought after nor desired, as I am thoroughly convinced it requires great abilities, and much more experience than I am master of."

But he added his belief that the Divine Providence, which had called him into such a dangerous duty, was wisely ordering the affairs of men, and would enable him in due course of time to perform all his tasks justly and with success.

What that task was through the revolutionary war can be appreciated only in the details of events that require volumes of description in telling. One cannot read it through with its ign.o.ble intrigues, unpatriotic dissentions, and dangerous rivalries without feeling that Was.h.i.+ngton combined great manhood, great leaders.h.i.+p, great statesmans.h.i.+p and great generals.h.i.+p, and that no other man of less character and genius than that could ever have welded together such discordant and diversified elements into a means sufficient to achieve the independence and liberty of America.

CHAPTER XIII

LARGE BODIES MOVE SLOWLY

I. THE FIRST COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF

There are events enough during the progress of the revolutionary war to give a complete a.n.a.lysis of Was.h.i.+ngton's mind and character, enough, indeed, to make a large volume in itself. But these incidents are easily available to any student of the revolutionary war. Of all his wonderful career, as a child born to the wealth and luxury of his times, as a landed proprietor of one of the greatest fortunes in America, as soldier, statesman and first President of the United States, there is nowhere on record a single ign.o.ble, immoral or dishonorable word or deed in any way relating to the principles or interests fundamental for his character, mind and life. It is supremely gratifying to American ideals that Was.h.i.+ngton was in everything morally worthy of being known as "first in peace, first in war and first in the hearts of his countrymen," standing forth a great figure of American n.o.bility, crowned with high t.i.tle in being known as the "Father of his Country."

The army was anxious to see their chief and the people were eager for a look at the man who inspired them all with so much confidence.

Was.h.i.+ngton's appearance could not disappoint them. No more born-commander of men, at least in appearance, ever sat in military uniform upon a horse. The emotions of the people in those troubulous times all went out to him, as they cheered him wherever he went. To know Was.h.i.+ngton is to know that his feelings responded heartily to their interests, and no doubt were strengthened by their trust for the wonder-working task before him.

One of the most intellectual and charming of the cultured women of New England was the wife of John Adams. After meeting Was.h.i.+ngton she wrote to her husband, "Dignity, ease and complacency, the gentleman and the soldier, look agreeably blended in him. Modesty marks every feature of his face. Those lines of Dryden instantly occurred to me:

'Mark his majestic fabric! He's a temple Sacred by birth and built by hands divine; His soul's the deity that lodges there; Nor is the pile unworthy of the G.o.d.'"

As an incident of the mult.i.tudinous varieties of problems that Was.h.i.+ngton had to solve may be mentioned the treatment of the American prisoners taken by the British. The Americans were regarded as rebels, having no more standing in law than traitors. If the student looks carefully at the dates of progress in the freedom of the colonies and their formation into a nation, he will see that many years of wrangle and debate took place. Nothing went by leaps. Opinions grew and they grew very slowly and uncertainly. Therefore, when a crisis came, Was.h.i.+ngton had to make momentous decisions that were not only of far reaching consequences, but that he could execute and that his people would sanction. He was not a silent man. He wrote and spoke much, thus clearing the way for action, and unifying the mind of the people on the needs and rights of the times.

An extract from a letter to the British General Gage, in the beginning of the war, shows on what grounds Was.h.i.+ngton demanded the right treatment of American prisoners, who had so far been grossly mistreated.

"They suppose," he wrote, concerning American prisoners, "that they act from the n.o.blest of all principles, a love of freedom and their country. But political principles, I conceive, are foreign to this point. The obligations arising from the rights of humanity, and claims of rank, are universally binding and extensive, except in cases of retaliation.

"My duty now makes it necessary to apprise you that, for the future, I shall regulate all my conduct towards those gentlemen who are or may be in our possession exactly by the rule you shall observe toward those of ours now in your custody."

Though General Gage's reply was full of the words "criminals,"

"rebels," and "hanging," the harsh treatment became generally modified as he realized that Was.h.i.+ngton meant what he said.

II. BIG BUSINESS, MONEY-MAKERS AND PATRIOTISM

Public sentiment when not aroused by immediate danger gets into action very slowly, and especially if it is divided into numerous rival sections as was the case in the colonies. The army at first consisted of two extremes, the real patriots and the many army adventurers. It was an age of travelling soldiers. Especially was there an overwhelming offer from foreign officers to go into service. To refuse them looked like ingrat.i.tude. It brought up the old saying of "looking a gift horse in the mouth." But the wisdom and firmness of Was.h.i.+ngton was never put to better use than here. He believed that Americans should win the war. In the darkest period he said, "Put none but Americans on guard tonight."

In one of his letters he speaks of the "hungry adventurers," whose endless applications for commands were one of his worst annoyances.

And, still more, many of these soldiers of fortune came from Europe with great recommendations and they secured powerful influences in Congress to force themselves upon Was.h.i.+ngton.

The mind of the times stood in great awe of British power, therefore it is additional credit to the mind of Was.h.i.+ngton that he had no such fear or awe toward British might. Besides, the country was always asking impossible things. Congress urged Was.h.i.+ngton to surround the enemy and cut off their supplies. They had no vision of Was.h.i.+ngton's inadequate means. Therefore enemies arose a.s.serting they could do what Was.h.i.+ngton was not doing, and the American army had not only the confusion of interests in its own ranks to contend with, but was between a contentious congress and a hardly more contentious British army. Was.h.i.+ngton's methods now look so reasonable and practical that we wonder how the people could be so ignorant, blind and obstructive, but a century later than our time may show us to be stoning our prophets and killing our saviors, just as they have done through all the periods of history. It is the disastrous tribute that democracy pays to partisans.h.i.+p, and that humanity has always paid partisan leaders.h.i.+p.

The malignant intrigues that tried to take advantage of the slow progress of the war, and have hungry rivals put into Was.h.i.+ngton's place, are matters of special history. But Was.h.i.+ngton met those ill-begotten schemes with the cold indifference and calm dignity which were the unfailing measures of his life and character. Though he was sensitive, and high-spirited, he would not let that trait in his nature work to the advantage of his enemies. They worked up slights and insults all around him, but he never replied unless he dealt a stinging blow, or showed up the treacherous character of their work.

Much of the rivalry developed against Was.h.i.+ngton was of sectional prejudices, but the real intelligence and patriotism of the colonies would have nothing to do with it. In all those schemes to injure Was.h.i.+ngton we see the same method in politics used on up to the present time. Newspapers and speakers distort the achievements of political opponents into the most fanatical accusations, and bewilder the voter with charges and countercharges till he feels as if he were between the firing lines of two fighting armies, for one or the other of which he must cast his votes. But "belonging to a party" is happily not the honor it once was. The good of the country is found to be, not so much in the political platform of parties but in the character of men, harmonizing with the rights of man. It is thus that the congressional resolutions and the party wrangling of Was.h.i.+ngton's time, as in that of Lincoln, are wholly discredited in estimating the lives of those great leaders of the American mind. In its full view, the American ideal is seen to be that the man or woman who presides decently and righteously over the humanity of self or family or group is president of the human world.

The ignorant criticism of the time is well ill.u.s.trated from the dark winter days of Valley Forge. There, so little had Congress done for the army, the soldiers were literally starving. Most of them were barefoot, and so poorly provided that they had to sit up all night close to their camp-fire in order to keep from freezing. And yet the legislature of Pennsylvania issued a stern remonstrance against their going into winter quarters. Was.h.i.+ngton must keep to the open field and be in continual operation against the well-fed, thoroughly trained and highly equipped British troops.

Was.h.i.+ngton closed a letter to Congress, saying, in referring to those who thus condemned him, "They seem to have little feeling for the naked and distressed soldiers. I feel superabundantly for them, and from my soul I pity those miseries which it is neither in my power to relieve nor prevent."

As in our own times, big business found opportunity to fatten itself on the needs of the people. The greatness of Was.h.i.+ngton is in startling evidence when it is seen how he not only had to conduct a war and guide an unprovided army split up into rival sections, but he had to be statesman and diplomat enough to manage a menagerie of ideas ranging through the congressional sessions like animals broken loose in a circus. Each one was trying to perform something that was in effect worse than nothing. The representatives of the people gathered in the American capital have often since that time repeated the original show.

III. THE STRONG MIND FOR GREAT NEEDS

The union that is strength is always slow in the making. Minds get together slowly wherever there is freedom in thinking for thought-out individual responsibility.

In writing to Benjamin Harrison, Was.h.i.+ngton pointed out how detrimental it was for each colony to be centering itself on its own prosperity. To Colonel Joseph Reed, December, 1778, he wrote more freely of the "monopolizers, forestallers, and engrossers" who were "murderers of our cause."