Bass, Pike, Perch, and Others Part 2

As to the much-mooted subject of the gameness of the large-mouth ba.s.s I have no hesitation in saying, from an experience of nearly forty years, covering all sections of the country, that where the two species coexist there is no difference in their game qualities. The large-mouth is fully the equal of the small-mouth where they are exposed to the same conditions. Many anglers profess to think otherwise, but their deductions are drawn from a comparison of the two species when subject to totally different environment; for it is altogether a matter of environment and not of physical structure or idiosyncrasy that influences their game qualities. A small-mouth ba.s.s in a clear, rocky stream, highly aerated as it must be, is, as a matter of course, more active than a large-mouth ba.s.s in a quiet, weedy pond.

With others the opinion is merely a matter of prejudice or hearsay, a prejudice that is, indeed, difficult to account for. It does not make the small-mouth ba.s.s a gamer fish by disparaging the large-mouth. As I have said elsewhere, if the large-mouth ba.s.s is just as game as the small-mouth, the angler is just that much better off. As prejudice and ignorance go hand in hand, we are not surprised when we hear persons--I do not style them anglers--call the small-mouth the "true" black-ba.s.s, implying that the large-mouth is not a black-ba.s.s, but is, as they often say, the Oswego ba.s.s, which is, of course, absurd. I am glad to add, however, that the prejudice against the large-mouth ba.s.s is dying out among observant anglers, who know that a trout in a clear stream is more vigorous than one in a weedy, mucky pond.

From my own experience I am prepared to say that the large-mouth ba.s.s is more to be relied on in rising to the fly than the small-mouth, which fact should be taken into consideration when the gameness of the two species is compared. The remarks concerning fly-fis.h.i.+ng for the small-mouth ba.s.s are also applicable to the large-mouth, as both are fished for in the same way, and with the same tackle, except that the rod may be a little heavier. For the large ba.s.s of the Gulf states the rod should be fully eight ounces in weight, and the flies a trifle larger, on hooks Nos. 2 to 6; otherwise the tackle should be the same.

Minnow-casting for the large-mouth need not differ from that described for the small-mouth ba.s.s. The tackle likewise may be the same, though for the heavy ba.s.s of Florida the rod may be eight, or even nine ounces, if preferred. Hooks may also be employed of a larger size, say Nos. 1 to 1-0, or even 2-0, as larger minnows are used for bait.

Some anglers of the Middle West have adopted a very short rod of six feet or less for casting the live frog or pork-rind overhead, in the same way as casting a fly. This is a very primitive style of bait-casting, being the same as practised by bucolic boys and Southern negroes using a sapling pole without a reel. The frog is reeled up to within a few inches of the tip and propelled like a wad of clay from a slender stick as we were wont to do as boys. The frog is projected with great accuracy, but not without a smack and splash on the water. With such a rod most of the pleasure of playing a ba.s.s to a finish is lost.

Presumably the end justifies the means, but this method does not appeal to the artistic angler. If bait must be used, a small minnow, lightly cast from a suitable rod, is more in accordance with the eternal fitness of things and the practice and traditions of the gentle art. In very weedy ponds and lakes, however, where there is not open water enough to play a ba.s.s, and where it must be landed as soon as possible, this rod and style of casting answer a good purpose.

[Ill.u.s.tration OSWEGO (LARGE-MOUTH) Ba.s.s]

Still-fis.h.i.+ng is the same for either species of black-ba.s.s, but as it is usually done from an anch.o.r.ed boat on Northern lakes, where the large-mouth ba.s.s is of greater size and weight than the small-mouth ba.s.s, somewhat heavier tackle may be used than recommended for the small-mouth.

Trolling with the live or dead minnow, or a small spoon with a single hook, is a very successful method on lakes, ponds, and broad, still rivers. A greater length of line can be utilized in trolling, whereby the fish is not so apt to see the angler. More ground can also be covered than in any other style of fis.h.i.+ng. The boat should be propelled slowly along the borders of rushes and weed patches, over shoals and gravelly banks, and near projecting points of the sh.o.r.e. Considerable care should be exercised to move as noiselessly as possible, avoiding splas.h.i.+ng with the oars or paddle, or making any undue noise with the feet or otherwise in the boat, as such sounds are conveyed a long distance in so dense a medium as water. In trolling, the line may be lengthened to fifty yards, if necessary, though from twenty to thirty yards will usually be sufficient, especially when a good breeze is blowing.

Bobbing for the large-mouth ba.s.s is much in vogue in the Gulf states, but is more often practised in Florida. The conventional "bob" is formed by tying a strip of deer's tail, with or without a piece of red flannel, around a triangle of hooks, the hairs completely investing the hooks. A single hook, however, answers fully as well or better. The hook is of large size, Nos. 3-0 to 5-0. The method of procedure is as follows: The boat is propelled by a single-bladed paddle, the paddler being seated in the stern. The boat is moved silently and cautiously, skirting the edges of water-lilies and bonnets, which grow thickly along the margin of the channels. The angler is seated in the bow with a very long cane rod, to which is affixed a short line of a few feet, not to exceed six. As the boat advances, the angler dances the bob as far ahead as possible. It is held a few inches or a foot above the water, into which it is "bobbed"

at short intervals. Sometimes the ba.s.s leaps from the water to seize it.

When hooked, the fish islanded without any ceremony and as soon as possible, keeping it meanwhile on the surface, to prevent its taking to the weeds. Bartram described bobbing as practised in Florida, for black-ba.s.s, nearly a century and a half ago.

Although ba.s.s fis.h.i.+ng dates back to the middle of the eighteenth century, when bobbing, skittering, and still-fis.h.i.+ng were common methods in the extreme Southern states for the large-mouth ba.s.s, and though the dawn of the nineteenth century saw bait-fis.h.i.+ng and fly-fis.h.i.+ng for the small-mouth ba.s.s in Kentucky, it is surprising how little was known in the Northern and Eastern states about the black-ba.s.s and ba.s.s fis.h.i.+ng a century after Bartram described bobbing for that game-fish in the narrative of his travels. Even so late as 1871, when the _Forest and Stream_ was established, very little appeared in its pages anent ba.s.s fis.h.i.+ng. Indeed, a few years later, a discussion lasting a year or more appeared in its columns from week to week, as to whether the black-ba.s.s would rise to the fly. Previous to the publication of the writer's "Book of the Black-ba.s.s" in 1881, no work on angling gave any but the most meagre account of black-ba.s.s or ba.s.s fis.h.i.+ng. The "American Angler's Guide," published in 1849 by John J. Brown, states that the black-ba.s.s has rows of small teeth, two dorsal fins, and a swallowtail. In the same work the large-mouth ba.s.s of the Southern states is cla.s.sified under the head of "brook trout," the author being misled apparently by its Southern name of "trout," and goes on to say that they "grow much larger than Northern trout," and that they "are fished for with the same arrangement of tackle as the striped ba.s.s or salmon." A contributor to the work, however, from Buffalo, New York, treats briefly and vaguely of still-fis.h.i.+ng with minnows and crawfish. Brief notes also from Southern and Western anglers give fair descriptions of the appearance and habits of both species of black-ba.s.s. Frank Forester (Henry W. Herbert) knew no more of the black-ba.s.s than Mr. Brown, and acknowledges that he never caught one. That old Nestor of angling, Uncle Thad Norris, in his "American Angler's Book," 1864, gives the descriptions of Louis Aga.s.siz and Dr. Holbrook for the black-ba.s.s, and then relates his only experience as follows, "I have taken this ba.s.s in the vicinity of St.

Louis, on a moons.h.i.+ny night, by skittering a light spoon over the surface of the water, while standing on the sh.o.r.e." Genio C. Scott in his "Fis.h.i.+ng in American Waters," 1869, has less to say, and evidently knew less of the black-ba.s.s than any of the earlier writers. He gives just three lines concerning black-ba.s.s fis.h.i.+ng, saying, "This fish is taken by casting the artificial fly, or by trolling with the feathered spoon, with a minnow impaled on a gang of hooks, and forming spinning tackle." Of all the angling authors prior to 1870, Robert B. Roosevelt is the only one who knew anything about black-ba.s.s or black-ba.s.s fis.h.i.+ng, having fished for it in the St. Lawrence basin. He says, "They will take minnows, s.h.i.+ners, gra.s.shoppers, frogs, worms, or almost anything else that can be called a bait." Also, "They may be captured by casting the fly as for salmon or trout, and this is by far the most sportsmanlike way, but the most destructive and usually resorted to is trolling." The only personal experience he gives of black-ba.s.s fis.h.i.+ng, unfortunately, is by trolling with large flies. In his "Game Fish of the North," 1862, he devotes five pages to the black-ba.s.s, but apparently does not discriminate between the two species. In "Superior Fis.h.i.+ng,"

1865, he devotes two pages to the black-ba.s.s of Canada and the Great Lakes, in a general way, but gives two instances of fis.h.i.+ng as follows, "Pedro soon hooked a splendid black-ba.s.s, and landed him after a vigorous struggle of half an hour; he weighed three pounds and three-quarters, and was thoroughly game." And again, "That evening was again devoted to the black-ba.s.s, which took both the fly and spoon greedily."

During the period covered by the authors named, from 1849 to 1869, the anglers of the South and Middle West were using light cane rods, Kentucky reels, and the smallest sea-gra.s.s lines for bait-fis.h.i.+ng, and trout fly-rods and trout-tackle for fly-fis.h.i.+ng, rods and tackle as light, to say the least, as those in use to-day.

In 1866 I removed to Oconomowoc, Wisconsin, where there were thirty lakes within ten miles abounding in black-ba.s.s of both species, with pike, rock-ba.s.s, c.r.a.ppies, perch, etc. On my home grounds was a large shallow pond fed from Fowler Lake. Becoming much interested in the black-ba.s.s, and finding but little information available in the books of that day concerning their habits, I determined to give some study to the subject. Accordingly I cut a ditch from the pond to the lake, with suitable screens, and stocked it with black-ba.s.s of both species. During their sp.a.w.ning period in the summer I watched them faithfully and constantly from a blind of bushes on the bank. This I did for several years, turning the adult ba.s.s into the lake when the fry were large enough to look out for themselves, and turning the fry out also in the fall.

I extended my observations of the ba.s.s during their breeding season to the many lakes near by. I found a difference of several weeks in the time of their sp.a.w.ning in these lakes, owing to the difference in temperature, caused by their varying depth. The appearance of the ba.s.s also differed slightly in the various lakes, so that it was possible, from a close study of their variations in color, size, and contour, to determine in what particular lake any string of ba.s.s was taken.

About the same time, from 1868 to 1870, Mr. Cyrus Mann and Mr. H.D.

Dousman established their trout hatchery and ponds not far from Oconomowoc, and Colonel George Shears, of Beaver Lake, a few miles away, also began hatching trout on a smaller scale. These establishments presented an opportunity to study the artificial propagation of brook-trout, and I soon became familiar with the _modus operandi_. This was before the inst.i.tution of the United States Fish Commission, though the state of Wisconsin already had an able and efficient Fish Commission, Mr. H.D. Dousman being one of the commissioners. Colonel Shears also experimented with black-ba.s.s culture, and between us we reared many thousands to the age of three months, before turning them out. Near my pond was a shallow, marshy cove to which the pike resorted in early spring to sp.a.w.n, giving me an opportunity to study their breeding habits, also. There being so many lakes and ponds in the vicinity, and their being so well supplied with fishes of various kinds, my opportunities for the observation of fish life were as great as fortunate.

The differences of opinion among anglers, of all men, pertaining to the practice of their art, has become axiomatic. Some will differ even to the estimation of a hair in the legs of an artificial fly, while it is averred others will go so far as to "divide a hair 'twixt south and south-west side," as Butler has it. But, seriously, there are several moot points which I have endeavored to discuss in the following piscatorial polemic.

Two friends went fis.h.i.+ng. Both were famous black-ba.s.s anglers, with the enthusiasm born of a genuine love and an inherent appreciation of the gentle art so common among Kentucky gentlemen. One was a fly-fisher, the other a bait-fisher. Each was a devotee to his especial mode of angling, though generously tolerant of the other's method. They had fished together for years when the dogwood and redbud blossomed in the spring, and when the autumnal tints clothed the hillsides with scarlet and gold.

They differed in their methods of fis.h.i.+ng from choice, or from some peculiar, personal idiosyncrasy, for each was an adept with both bait and fly. But this difference in their piscatorial practices, like the diversity of nature, produced perfect harmony instead of discord. Each extolled the advantages and sportsmans.h.i.+p of his own method, but always in a brotherly and kindly manner; never dictatorial or opinionated in argument, or vainglorious and boastful as to his skill, for both were possessed of the generous impulses of gentlemen and the kindly influences of the gentle art. Moreover, they were innately conscious of a common aim, and differed only as to the ways and means of best attaining that end, which, while dissimilar, were not inharmonious.

And so the Silver Doctor and the Golden s.h.i.+ner, as they dubbed each other, went trudging along the bank of the merry stream together. The Doctor, lightly equipped with only rod, fly-book, and creel, sometimes relieved the s.h.i.+ner by toting his minnow bucket or minnow net. They were fis.h.i.+ng a rocky, gently flowing river, characteristic of the Blue Gra.s.s section.

They stopped at a broad, lakelike expansion of the stream, caused by a mill-dam, and, in a quiet cove at the entrance of a clear brook. Golden s.h.i.+ner proceeded to fill his minnow bucket with lively minnows, using for the purpose an umbrella-like folding net. This he attached to a long, stout pole, and, after baiting it with crushed biscuit, lowered it into the water. In a short time he had all the bait necessary--chubs, s.h.i.+ners, and steelbacks.

"The golden s.h.i.+ner is the best of all," said he, "especially for roily or milky water; but the chub and steelback are stronger and livelier on the hook, and for very clear water are good enough."

They then proceeded below the mill-dam, where there was a strong riffle, with likely-looking pools and eddies.

"The proper way to hook a minnow is through the lips," continued Golden s.h.i.+ner, "especially for casting. One can give a more natural motion to the minnow on drawing it through the water. For still-fis.h.i.+ng, hooking through the tail or under the back fin will answer; but even then I prefer my method, unless the minnow is less than two inches in length."

And he made a long cast toward the eddy of a large boulder.

"For the same reason," acquiesced Silver Doctor, "artificial flies are tied with the head next the snell,"--industriously casting to right and left over the riffle.

"But some flies are tied with the tail next to the snell," ventured s.h.i.+ner.

"That is true, but it is unnatural. I never saw an insect swim tail first up-stream. Nature is the best teacher, and one should endeavor to follow her lead." Just then the Doctor snapped off his point fly. Upon examination he found that the snell was dry and brittle next to the head of the fly, though he had previously soaked it well in a gla.s.s of water.

He discovered that a drop of sh.e.l.lac varnish had encroached beyond the head of the fly for perhaps the sixteenth of an inch on the snell. This portion, being waterproof, remained dry and brittle--a very common fault with cheap flies.

"This fly," said the Doctor, "was given to me for trial by Judge Hackle.

He tied it himself. The broken end of the snell still shows a portion of sh.e.l.lac coating."

"I never thought of that before," remarked s.h.i.+ner. "No doubt many flies are cracked off from the same cause."

"Without a doubt, as you say. I know a lady," continued the Doctor, "who, as Walton says, 'has a fine hand,' and who superintends an extensive artificial fly establishment--and who has written the best book ever published on the subject of artificial flies--who personally inspects every fly turned out by her tyers. And, moreover, she varnishes the head of every fly herself, in order that not the least particle of sh.e.l.lac may touch the snell. Such careful supervision and honest work, to quote Walton again, 'like virtue, bring their own reward,'" and the Doctor resumed his casting with another fly.

"Well, Doctor, I sympathize with you; but my snells are clear-quill and no varnish. I may throw off a minnow once in a while by a very long cast, but it is soon replaced, and costs nothing. And, speaking of casting, I observed that you made half a dozen casts to reach yonder rock but sixty feet away, while I placed my minnow, by a single cast, a hundred feet in the other direction. Moreover, I reel my line toward me through undisturbed water, while you whipped the entire distance by several preliminary casts."

"That is necessarily true," answered the Doctor; "but while you must recover all of your line for a new cast, I can cast repeatedly with the extreme length of my line in any direction; so I think honors are easy on the question of casting."

"But," persisted s.h.i.+ner, "with my quadruple multiplying reel, it is only a matter of a few seconds to prepare for a new cast. Then again. I have better control of a hooked fish, and can give and take line much faster than you with your single-action click reel."

"While I grant your reel has a great advantage in speed, I hold that a single-action click reel is all-sufficient to play and land a hooked fish. Your reel is intended particularly to make long initial casts, and it is admirably adapted for that especial purpose; but in playing a ba.s.s it has no advantage over a click reel; in fact, I prefer the latter for that purpose. Really, the engine of destruction to the hooked fish is the rod. Its constant strain and yielding resistance, even without a reel of any kind, will soon place him _hors de combat_."

Golden s.h.i.+ner was not slow to perceive the force of the Doctor's arguments and held his peace. In the meantime both anglers had succeeded in killing some half-dozen ba.s.s, the largest ones falling to the rod of the bait fisher, as is usually the case. The sun was now climbing toward the zenith, and the Doctor's flies seemed to have lost their attractiveness for the wary ba.s.s, while the s.h.i.+ner, seeking deeper water, was still successful in his efforts. The day, however, was becoming uncomfortably warm.

"You will admit, Doctor, that you must cast your flies early in the day or late in the afternoon to insure much success, while I can fish during the middle of the day in deeper water and still have a measure of reward, which I consider quite an advantage of bait over fly."

"Granted. Fish rise to the fly only in comparatively shallow water, and are found in such situations in bright weather only early and late in the day. But I prefer to fish at just those times. I do not care to fish during the middle portion of the day in summer." And the Doctor proceeded to reel in his final cast.

Just then his friend hooked the largest fish of the morning's outing. It was an unusually gamy ba.s.s, and leaped several times in rapid succession from the water, shaking itself violently each time. But the s.h.i.+ner was equal to "his tricks and his manners," and soon had him in the landing-net.

"Doctor, why does a hooked ba.s.s break water and shake his head? Is it through fear or rage?"

"It is to rid his jaws of the hook. He can neither pick his teeth with a fin, nor remove a foreign substance from his mouth with his tail. His mouth is his prehensile organ. A horse, cow, dog, or fowl will shake the head violently to rid its mouth of an offending object. But a fish, having no neck to speak of, can only shake his head by shaking his body, and that only in a lateral direction. As a ba.s.s cannot shake himself energetically enough beneath the water to dislodge the hook, owing to the resistance of the denser medium, he naturally leaps into the air for that purpose; and he always does so with widely extended jaws, as you have seen time and again this morning. He probably also fortifies himself at the same time by taking in oxygen from the air. He does so, at all events, w.i.l.l.y-nilly."

"How high can a black-ba.s.s leap from the water, do you think?"

"A foot or two at most, as you well know," replied the Doctor. "In rocky streams like this, one has a good gauge for measuring the leap. I never saw a ba.s.s leap as high as yonder boulder, which is about three feet above the water; and as you have taken several fish in its eddy, you might have proved it by your own observation, as I did myself."

"I distinctly remember, now," affirmed s.h.i.+ner, "that my last catch--the big fellow--leaped several times very near that same rock, and he did not go half as high."

The two friends then repaired to a cool spring beneath a spreading beech, to enjoy a luncheon and a quiet pipe,--well satisfied with their morning's sport,--and to continue the _argumentum ad hominem_ anent fly and bait, with the usual result that;

"A man convinced against his will.

Is of the same opinion still."

THE ROCK-Ba.s.s