The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation - LightNovelsOnl.com
You're reading novel online at LightNovelsOnl.com. Please use the follow button to get notifications about your favorite novels and its latest chapters so you can come back anytime and won't miss anything.
[1453] Goto _v._ Lane, 265 U.S. 393 (1924).
[1454] Salinger _v._ Loisel, 265 U.S. 224 (1924).
[1455] Wong Doo _v._ United States, 265 U.S. 239 (1924).
[1456] Price _v._ Johnston, 334 U.S. 266, 294 (1948).
[1457] Corwin, The President, Office and Powers, 178 (3d ed., 1948).
[1458] Ex parte Bollman, 4 Cr. 75, 101 (1807).
[1459] Messages and Papers of the Presidents, VII, 3219 (1897).
[1460] Fed. Cas. No. 9, 487 (1861).
[1461] 10 Op. Atty. Gen. 74, 89 (1861-1863).
[1462] 12 Stat. 755 (1863).
[1463] 4 Wall. 2 (1866).
[1464] Ibid. 114.
[1465] Story, Commentaries on the Const.i.tution, II, -- 1344 (4th ed., 1873).
[1466] c.u.mmings _v._ Missouri, 4 Wall. 277, 323 (1867).
[1467] United States _v._ Lovett, 328 U.S. 303, 315 (1946).
[1468] Ex parte Garland, 4 Wall. 333, 377 (1867).
[1469] United States _v._ Lovett, 328 U.S. 303 (1946).
[1470] Story, Commentaries on the Const.i.tution, II, -- 1345.
[1471] 3 Dall. 386, 393 (1798).
[1472] Bankers Trust Co. _v._ Blodgett, 260 U.S. 647, 652 (1923).
[1473] Burgess _v._ Salmon, 97 U.S. 381 (1878).
[1474] Calder _v._ Bull, 3 Dall. 386, 390 (1798); Ex parte Garland, 4 Wall. 333, 377 (1867); Burgess _v._ Salmon, 97 U.S. 381, 384 (1878).
[1475] United States _v._ Powers, 307 U.S. 214 (1939).
[1476] Neely _v._ Henkel, 180 U.S. 109, 123 (1901). _Cf._ In re Yamas.h.i.+ta, 327 U.S. 1, 26 (1946) (dissenting opinion of Justice Murphy); Hirota _v._ MacArthur, 338 U.S. 197, 199 (1948) (concurring opinion of Justice Douglas).
[1477] Ex parte Garland, 4 Wall. 333 (1867).
[1478] Murphy _v._ Ramsey, 114 U.S. 15 (1885).
[1479] Mahler _v._ Eby, 264 U.S. 32 (1924); Bugajewitz _v._ Adams, 228 U.S. 585 (1913).
[1480] Johannessen _v._ United States, 225 U.S. 227 (1912).
[1481] Cook _v._ United States, 138 U.S. 157, 183 (1891).
[1482] Calder _v._ Bull, 3 Dall. 386, 390 (1798).
[1483] Hopt _v._ Utah, 110 U.S. 574, 589 (1884).
[1484] 157 U.S. 429, 573 (1895).
[1485] 2 Madison, The Const.i.tutional Convention, 208 (Hunt's ed., 1908).
[1486] 3 Dall. 171 (1796).
[1487] 7 Hamilton's Works, 845, 848 (Hamilton's ed., 1851). "If the meaning of the word _excise_ is to be sought in the British statutes, it will be found to include the duty on carriages, which is there considered as an _excise_, and then must necessarily be uniform and liable to apportionment; consequently, not a direct tax." Ibid.
[1488] 4 Annals of Congress, 730 (1794); 2 Madison's Writings, 14, (Library of Congress ed., 1865) (Letter to Thomas Jefferson, May 11, 1794).
[1489] 3 Dall. 171, 177 (1796).
[1490] Pacific Ins. Co. _v._ Soule, 7 Wall. 433 (1869).
[1491] Veazie Bank _v._ Fenno, 8 Wall. 533 (1869).
[1492] Scholey _v._ Rew, 23 Wall. 331 (1875).
[1493] Springer _v._ United States, 102 U.S. 586 (1881).
[1494] Ibid. 602.
[1495] 157 U.S. 429 (1895); 158 U.S. 601 (1895).
[1496] 28 Stat. 509 (1894).
[1497] Stanton _v._ Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916); Knowlton _v._ Moore, 178 U.S. 41, 80 (1900).
[1498] Nicol _v._ Ames, 173 U.S. 509 (1899).
[1499] Knowlton _v._ Moore, 178 U.S. 41 (1900).
[1500] Patton _v._ Brady, 184 U.S. 608 (1902).
[1501] 192 U.S. 363 (1904).
[1502] Ibid. 370.
