The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation - LightNovelsOnl.com
You're reading novel online at LightNovelsOnl.com. Please use the follow button to get notifications about your favorite novels and its latest chapters so you can come back anytime and won't miss anything.
[27] Martin _v._ Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 335 (1816).
[28] 93 U.S. 130 (1876).
[29] Martin _v._ Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 335 (1816).
[30] 93 U.S. 130, 137 (1876).
[31] Mondou _v._ New York, N.H. & H.R. Co., 223 U.S. 1, 57 (1912).
[32] 330 U.S. 386 (1947).
[33] Ibid. 393.
[34] Ableman _v._ Booth, 21 How. 506, 523 (1859), followed in United States _v._ Tarble, 13 Wall. 397 (1872).
[35] Tennessee _v._ Davis, 100 U.S. 257 (1880); _see also_ Maryland _v._ Soper, 270 U.S. 36 (1926).
[36] 135 U.S. 1 (1890).
[37] Keith _v._ Clark, 97 U.S. 454, 461 (1878).
[38] White _v._ Cannon, 6 Wall. 443, 450 (1868). _See also_ Hickman _v._ Jones, 9 Wall. 197 (1870); Dewing _v._ Perdicaries, 96 U.S. 193, 195 (1878).
[39] Ford _v._ Surget, 97 U.S. 594, 604 (1878); United States _v._ Keehler, 9 Wall. 83, 86 (1870).
[40] Texas _v._ White, 7 Wall. 700, 726 (1869).
[41] Ibid. 733. _See also_ Horn _v._ Lockhart, 17 Wall. 570, 580 (1873); Thomas _v._ Richmond, 12 Wall. 349, 357 (1871); White _v._ Hart, 13 Wall. 646 (1872); United States _v._ Home Ins. Co., 22 Wall. 99 (1875); Taylor _v._ Thomas, 22 Wall. 479 (1875); and Huntington _v._ Texas, 16 Wall. 402 (1873).
[42] 9 Wheat. 788 (1924).
[43] Ibid. 865.
[44] Ibid.
[45] Ibid. 866.
[46] Ibid. 867.
[47] 2 Pet. 449 (1829), followed in New York ex rel. Bank of Commerce _v._ Comrs. of Taxes and a.s.sessments, 2 Bl. 620 (1863).
[48] 12 Stat. 710 (1863).
[49] 31 U.S.C. -- 742 (1946).
[50] 7 Wall. 26 (1869).
[51] Hibernia Sav. & L. Soc. _v._ San Francisco, 200 U.S. 310, 315 (1906).
[52] Smith _v._ Davis, 323 U.S. 111 (1944).
[53] Plummer _v._ Coler, 178 U.S. 115 (1900); Blodgett _v._ Silberman, 277 U.S. 1, 12 (1928).
[54] Northwestern Mutual L. Ins. Co. _v._ Wisconsin, 275 U.S. 136, 140 (1927).
[55] Miller _v._ Milwaukee, 272 U.S. 713 (1927).
[56] Provident Inst. for Savings _v._ Ma.s.sachusetts, 6 Wall. 611 (1868); Society for Savings _v._ Coite, 6 Wall. 594 (1868); Hamilton Mfg. Co.
_v._ Ma.s.sachusetts, 6 Wall. 632 (1868); Home Ins. Co. _v._ New York, 134 U.S. 594 (1890).
[57] Macallen _v._ Ma.s.sachusetts, 279 U.S. 620, 625 (1929).
[58] Northwestern Mutual L. Ins. Co. _v._ Wisconsin, 275 U.S. 136 (1927).
[59] 9 Wheat. 738 (1824).
[60] Ibid. 867.
[61] 302 U.S. 134 (1937).
[62] Alward _v._ Johnson, 282 U.S. 509 (1931).
[63] Trinityfarm Const. Co. _v._ Grosjean, 291 U.S. 466 (1934).
[64] Atkinson _v._ Tax Commission, 303 U.S. 20 (1938).
[65] Superior Bath House Co. _v._ McCarroll, 312 U.S. 176 (1941).
[66] Buckstaff Bath House _v._ McKinley, 308 U.S. 358 (1939).
[67] Collins _v._ Yosemite Park & Curry Co., 304 U.S. 518 (1938).
[68] Alabama _v._ King & Boozer, 314 U.S. 1 (1941), overruling Panhandle Oil Co. _v._ Knox, 277 U.S. 218 (1928) and Graves _v._ Texas Co., 298 U.S. 393 (1936). _See also_ Curry _v._ United States, 314 U.S. 14 (1941).
[69] Wilson _v._ Cook, 327 U.S. 474 (1946).
[70] 306 U.S. 466 (1939), followed in State Tax Comm'n. _v._ Van Cott, 306 U.S. 511 (1939). This case overruled by implication Dobbins _v._ Erie County, 16 Pet. 435 (1842) and New York ex rel. Rogers _v._ Graves, 299 U.S. 401 (1937), which held the income of federal employees to be immune from State taxation.
[71] 306 U.S. 466, 487 (1939).
[72] Ibid. 492.
[73] 4 Wheat. 316, 426 (1819).
[74] Thompson _v._ Union P.R. Co., 9 Wall. 579, 588 (1870); Railroad Co.
_v._ p.e.n.i.ston, 18 Wall. 5, 31 (1873).
[75] Susquehanna Power Co. _v._ State Tax Comm'n., 283 U.S. 291 (1931).
